Gandhi and the Journey of Independence - 2191 Words

Intorduction In History, we have always learned about heroes, leaders, and people who made accomplishments that in a way have changed the world. We live for what others have done. Any courageous step taken by an individual in order to achieve a goal, a belief, and seek for a right, comes only from a person with leadership, huge spirit, and greatness. We have always looked back at leaders in our history that have made life easier for us. For that, I would like to write about an extraordinary personality that has achieved a big, difficult step for the good of Indians. Mohandas Gandhi is considered for many people the man of the century. This poor man has done what powerful political rulers couldn’t do. The Mahatma had fought and joined many†¦show more content†¦He dedicated himself to plan for the self rule. He asked all Indians to resist the British rule and to fight nonviolently as other Indians did in South Africa. He first motivated Indians to form and join nonviolent protests a nd strikes. â€Å"Prisons began to fill with thousands of men and women who refused to co-operate with the British government. They refused to pay unfair taxes and refused to work in government jobs. They were beaten and thrown into horrible jails. Sometimes they were killed.† (Schaaf, 2000) Later, Gandhi himself was imprisoned. The Amritsar Massacre After he was released, he declared a new Satyagraha. As thousands of followers started their disobedience, the British stated the Rowlatt Acts against the revolutionaries. He thought that such a demonstration would lead into a positive solution, but it led into huge massacres and fights with the British soldiers. As Indians resisted against the Act, the British soldiers were ordered to shoot on the rebellions, which led to the Amritsar Massacre, â€Å"The killing of 379 Indians (and wounding of 1,200) in Amritsar, at the site of a Sikh religious shrine in the Punjab in 1919.† (Tiscali.com, 2006) Second campaign against British Following this disaster, Gandhi started a huge non-cooperation with the British government by boycotting the British goods, as well as the English language. He taught Indians to make their own clothes instead of buying the British ones, leading to theShow MoreRelatedGandhi and the Journey of Independence2184 Words   |  9 Pagespersonality that has achieved a big, difficult step for the good of Indians. Mohandas Gandhi is considered for many people the man of the century. This poor man has done what powerful political rulers couldn’t do. The Mahatma had fought and joined many Indians against the British Rule. Not giving up for years, he succeeded in gaining independence. This Essay will talk about Gandhi’s journey of leadership and Independence. It will first briefly talk about his youth and education, and then it will discussRead MoreGandhi Heros Journey Essay936 Words   |  4 PagesMahatma Gandhi once said, â€Å"You must be the change you wish to see in the worl d†. This shows that Gandhi believed in peaceful change. Gandhi was well known in India by many people. People were inspired by his ways and would stand by him in peaceful protesting. A lot of people believed in Gandhi as a hero. Just as well, Percy Jackson from the Lightning Thief is a known hero for stopping world WWIII between the gods. Both Gandhi and Percy Jackson follow the path of the hero s journey because they reRead MoreHero Comparison Essay: Odysseus vs Gandhi1619 Words   |  7 Pagesof heroes, epic heroes and modern heroes. Odysseus, one of the most famous epic heroes ever, will be compared to Mahatma Gandhi, a modern day hero, to see if there really is a large gap separating the two types. However, one thing is certain, modern heroes can be identical to epic heroes if they are larger than life, embody the ideals of their culture, embark on a perilous journey, and possess super-human, prominent characteristics. Epic heroes are always larger than life; however, modern day heroesRead MoreGandhi s Effect On The Independence Of India1713 Words   |  7 PagesOn March 12, 1930 Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi, more widely known as Mahatma Gandhi, began his famous salt march to the sea. Gandhi’s salt march was an act of civil disobedience, or satyagraha, which loosely means â€Å"truth-force†, against the rule of the British government over India at the time. This march was Gandhi’s way of fighting rejecting the tax that the British government had put on salt for the Indian people. Gandhi’s act of marching to the sea to produce salt sparked motions and revolutionsRead MoreResearch Paper On Mahatma Gandhi792 Words   |  4 Pages Mahatma Gandhi Intro: Mahatma Gandhi was the primary leader of India’s Independence movement, He was the person who thought about India, and gave all the rights that India deserved, when the great britain took over India. Mahatma Gandhi was born on the 2nd of october, 1869, in a village called porbandar, gujarat, India. Mahatma Gandhi had an early life struggle, he had a south african journey, he created a salt march, he did all of this just for India’s Independence. Mahatma Gandhi’s real nameRead MoreProfile Of A Positive Leader1124 Words   |  5 PagesProfile of a Positive Leader – Mahatma Gandhi Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi, addressed as ‘Bapu’ or ‘the father of the nation’ in India, was born on 2nd October 1869 in Porbandar district, in the state of Gujarat. He is known to be one of the most influential leaders in the history. As a child, Gandhi was very curious and intelligent. As a result, he was accepted to study at the University College London where he successfully completed his degree in law and became a barrister. He then returned to IndiaRead MoreGandhi : A Leader Of India s Movement1186 Words   |  5 PagesMohandas Gandhi was born in Porbandar, the present-day state of Gujarat in India, in the year 1869. He was raised by his father and his exceedingly religious mother who worshipped the Hindu god Vishnu and was influenced by Jainism, a religion that practiced self-discipline and nonviolence. Gandhi grew up exercising these same religions and followed Jainism to the point where he fasted and meditated regularly, practiced nonviolence, and was a vegetarian. These values that he grew up with becameRead MoreMahatma Gandhi : A Of A Privileged Caste1315 Words   |  6 PagesMohandas, better known as Mahatma Gandhi was born into a privileged caste in Pordandar, Gujarat, India. He was raised into a non-violent branch of Hinduism from his Mother’s side. Throughout his childhood he stayed true to his beliefs and religious rules, including avoiding things like meat and wine. Gandhi led a selfless, altruistic life, and through these powerful moral principles, he helped lead India to full independence in 1947. Growing up, Mohandas was the only one of the four children inRead MoreIndian Independence1255 Words   |  6 Pages22, 2010 Indian Independence India, in the 18th century was ruled by the British for two centuries. The Indians wanted freedom from the British. British looted and caused fights in India and treated them with no respect. The Indian Independence was caused by British Imperialism. The British wanted to take over India, but India wanted freedom as well since it’s their country not the British. Although politics and nationalism were important causes of the Indian Independence Movement, the mostRead MoreMahatma Gandhi and The Salt March Essays1427 Words   |  6 PagesIn an effort to help free India from the British rule, Mahatma Gandhi once again contributed to a protest against salt taxes, known as the Salt March. This protest advocated Gandhi’s theory of satyagraha or nonviolent disobedience as the nation came together on March 12, 1930 to walk the 241 miles long journey to the shores of Dandi to attain salt. Although some Indians criticized Gandhi for not achieving direct independence from the R aj or British rule, Gandhi’s execution of the Salt March helped

Developing A Theory Of Information Science Research

Developing a Theory in Information Science Research: A Review of Experts’ Advice Abstract Despite the growing number of theories within the field of information science, it still remains a difficult task for some emerging scholars in the field to clearly articulate the development of new theories from research studies. This paper reviewed and collated the different views of scholars on what a theory is and how a good theory can be developed. It explains the concept of a theory and the different components that make up a theory. The paper discusses the different processes of theory development by emphasizing what theory is and what theory is not. This review found that scholars differ in their definition of a theory, which led to using terms such as model, paradigm, framework and theory interchangeably. It found the lack of theoretical construct in a study to be one of the factors why articles are rejected for publication. It pointed that producing a paper that contributes to theory rests on the ability of scholars to develop original and new ideas that bring something ins ightful into scholarship, which can be applied to bring about fresh thinking. This paper may be of benefit to researchers, especially younger academics who are the future of scholarship in the field of information science and other disciplines. Introduction Studies with strong theoretical perspectives are often regarded as adding value to any field of learning. It is therefore essential for scholarsShow MoreRelatedFundamentals of Research Methodology1216 Words   |  5 PagesFundamentals of Research Methodology Paper Psychology is a discipline which seeks to study the thoughts and actions of men in a scientific way. Science is a marvelous development in the history of human thought. The American Heritage Dictionary defines psychology as the science dealing with the mind, mental and emotional processes, and the science of human behavior. It defines science as systemized knowledge derived from observations and study. Scientific study is a way of understandingRead MoreFundamentals of Research Methodology1135 Words   |  5 PagesFundamentals of Research Methodology Monique Vann PSYCH 540 March 24, 2013 Jeanne Henry, Ph.D. Fundamentals of Research Methodology This paper will explore the fundamentals of research methodology in the Psychology field and discuss the importance of psychology. The answers to these questions are the basis for the theories that led to research. Research is the groundwork performed by Psychologists in order to answer questions about behavior and the mind. The outcome of the research will offerRead MorePhilosophy Has Influenced The Development Of Nursing1572 Words   |  7 PagesPhilosophy of Nursing Philosophy has influenced the development of nursing. Philosophy of Nursing promotes the application of nursing knowledge and helps develop nursing theory and knowledge. Nursing theories and philosophies of nursing influence each other. Nurses designed Philosophy of nursing to explain the beliefs, role, and interaction with patients. Philosophy is the application of one s knowledge to different situations that occurs when practicing as a nurse. It changes the identities, beliefRead MoreTok Essay on Natural Sciences1597 Words   |  7 PagesWhat is it about theories in natural and human sciences that make them so convincing? During the course of my Biology HL syllabus, I came across the theory of the fluid mosaic model. I instantly considered this theory to be absolute and accurate. This level of certainty was created with the first reading of the theory, and evoked the question as to what makes the theories formulated in natural and human sciences as convincing as they are. Both Natural and Human scientists take pride in the fact thatRead MoreThe Theory Of Science Of The Twentieth Century1105 Words   |  5 Pagesinfluential philosophers of science of the twentieth century, once stated that â€Å"A person may be attracted to science for all sorts of reasons. Among them are the desire to be useful, the excitement of exploring new territory, the hope of finding order, and the drive to test established knowledge† (Krein, n.d., para. 1). Scientists for centuries have spent countless hours attracted to science in an attempt to understand the natural world. As a result, the evolution of science wit nessed the emergenceRead MoreThe American Nurses Credentialing Center1411 Words   |  6 PagesAssociation receive the discounted rate of $270 (ANCC, 2017). The test itself consists of four categories; information management and knowledge generation, which accounts for 37.33% of the test, professional practice, which represents 26.67% of the test, systems life cycle, which contains 22% of the test questions, and information technology, which consists of the remaining 14% of the information covered (ANCC, 2017). Currently, the test is comprised of 175 questions. Of those, only 150 are recordedRead MoreThe Theory Of Knowledge Management Models1694 Words   |  7 Pagesthe current knowledge management models they will only describe how knowledge process works but it will not be easy to evaluate the models or even determine their usefulness in both private and public organizations. I propose to fill this gap by developing a better end-to-end model for better knowledge management process (Jamaluddin Khalifa, 2012). Background of the Problem After observing most organizations I have realized how their planning is similar to a ritual rain dance; the dance has noRead MoreWhat Is Grounded Theory ( Glaser And Strauss )1661 Words   |  7 PagesIS project implementation. The study uses grounded theory (Glaser and Strauss 1967; c.f., Charmaz 2013; c.f., Corbin and Strauss 2015) in its focus on principles of emergence by which systematic generation and conceptualization of data provides meaning and relevance to concepts (Glaser and Strauss 1967). In accordance with the recommendations of engaged scholarship by Van de Ven (2007), the project began with the identification of a research problem identified to be relevant to experienced practitionersRead MoreThe Differences Between Science And Science848 Words   |  4 Pages Carey explains science to be genuine as well as having the use of rigorous testing of ideas using the scientific method to get results, this is usually done through an investigation (2012, p. 123). Pseudoscience is any type of method or theories, such as astrology, that is considered to not have a scientific basis (2015). Pseudoscience doesn’t follow the scientific method like science does. It sticks with evidence that is found instead of figuring out if it is acclaimed in the natural world. MajorityRead MoreChanging Perspective From Global Warming1554 Words   |  7 Pagesgroup of scientists through scientific research indicates that carbon dioxide is not responsible for global warming. For the past years, world media has aired news of the global warming subject. Global warming is caused by the sun but made to seem otherwise by political propaganda. The documentary changes the audience perspective from global warming to climate change. The documentary presents various professors of different fields of study in science agreeing to the statement that the greenhouse

Julius Caesar Shakespeare Essay Example For Students

Julius Caesar: Shakespeare Essay After the murder of Julius Caesar both Brutus and Antony made a speech to the citizens of Rome. Brutus was one of the conspirators who murdered Caesar, he was also a good friend of his but he murdered him on the behalf of Rome, he makes a speech to explain to the citizens why he did it. Antony was a loyal friend of Caesars and he makes a speech after Antony to commemorate Caesar. Brutus allowed Antony to do this so that he would not seem to be harsh and ruthless. Brutus was an idealist who wanted everything to be truthful and right. It was a big mistake letting Antony speak last and leaving him to speak, because his speech had a big effect on the fickle crowd. If Brutus had spoken last, then maybe the crowd would have turned in his favour as they had done after he made his speech at the beginning. Brutus speech is a blank verse; it is flat and responsible sounding. It is not poetical and does not use many sentences that are hard to understand, because he is speaking to the common people. He speaks to the people from the pulpit so he is distant from them and higher than they are. He is and intellectual and I think he finds it hard to relate to the common people. He is physically constipated; he uses nothing to grasp the crowds attention like Antony. He doesnt even use any gestures to show his emotions. There is a lack of passion and stagecraft in his speech, which makes it less powerful. Antony remarkably upstaged him. Brutus begins his speech Romans, countrymen and lovers, this is important, because he is addressing the people who love their country and are proud to be Romans. This means that his reason for murdering Caesar will be understood, because they would all do the same for their country. Believe me for mine honour, and have respect for mine honour that you may believe. He is saying in this sentence that he is an honourable man and they should believe what he says because of it. He asks them to respect him first so that they might look at the situation from a different point of view. If they dislike him then they might not believe what he is saying, but if he commands their respect first then they will look at it from his angle. If there be any in this assembly, any dear friend of Caesars, to him I say that Brutus love to Caesar was no less than his. He is stating the fact to the crowd that he did love Caesar as a dear friend. He uses the word love which is emotive and can be very powerful if used in the right context as it is here. He says that he loved Caesar so his reason for killing him must be very good. Not that I loved  Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more. Here he states his reason to the awaiting crowd. Again he uses the word love to involve emotions in the reason for killing Caesar. His reason is patriotism at its peak. He loved Rome so much that he would kill one of his dear friends to save it. I think this statement would have commanded great respect from the crowd, because they are all proud Romans. In the film of Julius Caesar there was a big uproar from the crowd at this point to show their respect for him. Had you rather Caesar were living, and die all slaves, than that Caesar were dead, to live all freemen? This rhetorical question makes the crowd realise that Caesar was a tyrant and that he would have lead a dictatorship if he had not been killed. Of course no one would like to be slaves so it seems absurd not to have killed Caesar sooner. The crowd is very fickle and will believe anything that Brutus says. He uses the words die and live to show that if Caesar lives they die, and if Caesar dies they live. As Caesar loved me, I weep for him; as he was fortunate, I rejoice at it; as he was valiant, I honour him; but, as he was ambitious I slew him. He uses emotive language again to show his love for Caesar and his sadness for his death. He praises Caesar for his fortune and bravery to prove again that he respected and loved him, and again gives the reason for his murder. Romeo's Character Analysis EssayYou all did love him once, not without cause; what cause withholds you then to mourn for him? At the beginning of the play, two tribunes ask the plebeians on the street why they have forgotten Pompey and why the dont mourn for his death. This part of Antonys speech reminds me of that. The crowd is so fickle that it forgets the great leader as soon as he is dead and move on to the next icon. Then Antony breaks off from his speech to supposedly weep; My heart is in the coffin there with Caesar, and I must pause till it come back to me. He then listens to the crowd to make sure it is safe to say something against Brutus or Cassius. This open show of emotion makes the crowd sympathetic of Antony; Poor soul, his eyes are red as fire with weeping. Then Mark Antony brings out the will, which is a very clever tactic which appeals to the greed of the Romans; But heres a parchment with the seal of Caesar, I found it in his closet, tis his will which, pardon me, I do not mean to read. He teases the crowd with this will, which he says will be full of riches for them. Its like holding a bone before a dog just out of its reach. This is a very clever tactic to keep the crowd hanging off of his every word; Being men, hearing the will of Caesar, it will inflame you, it will make you mad The crowd grow impatient and start to shout out for Antony to read the will; The will, the will, we will hear Caesars will! Antony cleverly uses the will to make the crowd say out loud bad things about Brutus and the conspirators. He uses their greed to fan the fires of hatred; I fear I wrong the honourable men whose daggers have stabbd Caesar, I do fear it. This turns the crowd around dramatically; They were traitors. Honourable men! At this point Antony comes down from the pulpit to the level of the common people. He comes face to face with them instead of keeping his distance like Brutus. He asks them to form a circle around Caesar so he can show you him who made the will. That day he overcame the Nervii. Holding Caesars cloak he casually reminds the crowd of Caesars great accomplishments. Look, in this place ran Cassius dagger through; see what a rent the envious  casca made; through this the well-beloved Brutus stabbd. Antony shows the crowd the holes that were made in the cloak from the daggers when he doesnt actually know who stabbed where. This is just a tactic to show the crowd something that will shock them. Then burst his mighty heart. Antony speaks of how Caesars heart burst when Brutus stabbed him. He makes it sound like Caesar died of grief from his best friend betraying him rather than by any physical means. This keeps up Caesars God like image. O, what a fall was there, my countrymen. Antony makes it sound like when Caesar fell, so did the whole of Rome, because Caesar was the one holding it together with his superior strength. I come not friends to steal away your hearts. Here Antony is being disingenuous, because he has already stolen away their hearts. He is trying to decieve them into thinking that he is not a clever man and that he is just like one of them; a plain blunt man. For I have neither wit, nor words, nor worth, action, nor utterance, nor the power of speech to stir mend blood. Why, friends, you go to do you know not what. Wherein hath Caesar thus deservd your loves? Alas, you know not! I must tell you then: You have forgot the will I told you of. The crowd is fickle and avaricious. They are easily changed and have a short attention and memory span. They had forgot Caesars will and were prepared to run riot already. Antony tells them what Caesar has left them. It is very democratic for he has left them money and his gardens. The crowd then riot for the loss of Caesar.

Modernism and Post Modernism in Literature Defining Briefly free essay sample

Henri Bergson  (1859–1941), on the other hand, emphasized the difference between scientific, clock time and the direct, subjective, human experience of time[3]  His work on time and consciousness had a great influence on twentieth-century novelists, especially those modernists who used the stream of consciousness technique, such as  Dorothy Richardson,  Pointed Roofs  (1915),  James Joyce,  Ulysses  (1922) and  Virginia Woolf  (1882–1941)  Mrs Dalloway  (1925),  To the Lighthouse  (1927). Also important in Bergsons philosophy was the idea of  elan vital, the life force, which brings about the creative evolution of everything  His philosophy also placed a high value on intuition, though without rejecting the importance of the intellect. These various thinkers were united by a distrust of Victorian positivism and certainty. Modernism as a literary movement can be seen also, as a reaction to industrialization,  urbanization  and new technologies. Modernist literature attempts to take into account changing ideas about reality developed by  Darwin,  Mach,  Freud,  Einstein,  Nietzsche, Bergson  and others. We will write a custom essay sample on Modernism and Post Modernism in Literature : Defining Briefly or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page From this developed innovative literary techniques such as stream-of-consciousness,  interior monologue, as well as the use of multiple points-of-view. Important literary precursors of Modernism were:  Fyodor Dostoyevsky  (1821–81) (Crime and Punishment  (1866),  The Brothers Karamazov  (1880));  Walt Whitman  (1819–92) (Leaves of Grass) (1855–91);  Charles Baudelaire  (1821–67) (Les Fleurs du mal),  Rimbaud(1854–91) (Illuminations, 1874);  August Strindberg  (1849–1912), especially his later plays, including, the trilogy  To Damascus  1898–1901,  A Dream Play  (1902),  The Ghost Sonata  (1907). At the beginning some modernists fostered a utopian spirit, stimulated by innovations in  anthropology,  psychology,  philosophy,  political theory,  physics  and  psychoanalysis. The poets of the  Imagist movement, founded by  Ezra Pound  in 1912 , as a new poetic style gave Modernism its early start in the 20th century,  were characterized by a positive spirit, rejecting the sentiment and discursiveness typical of Romantic and Victorian periods. or poetry that favoured a precision of  imagery, brevity and  Free verse. This idealism, however, ended, with the outbreak of World War I, and writers created more cynical works that reflected a prevailing sense of disillusionment. Many modernist writers also shared a mistrust of institutions of power such as government and religion, and rejected the notion of absolute truths. Later modernist works, such as  T. S. Eliots  The Waste Land  (1922), were increasingly self-aware, introspective, and often explored the darker aspects of human nature The term modernism covers a number of related, and overlapping, artistic and literary movements, including  Imagism,  Symbolism,Futurism,  Vorticism,  Cubism,  Surrealism,  Expressionism, and  Dada. Postmodernism in Literature Postmodernism   is in general the era that follows  Modernism. [1]  It frequently serves as an ambiguous overarching term for  skeptical  interpretations of  culture,  literature,  art,  philosophy,economics,  architecture,  fiction, and  literary criticism. It is also confused with  deconstructionand  post-structuralism  because its usage as a term gained significant popularity at the same time as twentieth-century post-structural thinker. One of the most well-known postmodernist concerns is deconstruction, a concern for philosophy, literary criticism, and textual analysis developed by  Jacques Derrida. The notion of a deconstructive approach implies an analysis that questions the already evident deconstruction of a text in terms of presuppositions, ideological underpinnings, hierarchical values, and frames of reference. A deconstructive approach further depends on the techniques of close reading without reference to cultural, ideological, moral opinions or information derived from an authority over the text such as the author. At the same time Derrida famously writes: Il ny a pas de hors-texte (there is no such thing as outside-of-the-text). [2]  Derrida implies that the world follows the grammar of a text undergoing its own deconstruction. Derridas method frequently involves recognizing and spelling out the different, yet similar interpretations of the meaning of a given text and the problematic implications of binary oppositions within the meaning of a text. Derridas philosophy influenced a postmodern movement called  deconstructivism  among architects, characterized by the intentional fragmentation, distortion, and dislocation of architectural elements in designing a building. Derrida discontinued his involvement with the movement after the publication of his collaborative project with architect Peter Eisenmann in  Chora L Works: Jacques Derrida and Peter Eisenman. Structuralism  was a philosophical movement developed by French academics in the 1950s, partly in response to French  Existentialism. It has been seen variously as an expression of  Modernism,  High modernism, or postmodernism[by whom? ]. Post-structuralists  were thinkers who moved away from the strict interpretations and applications of structuralist ideas. Many American academics consider post-structuralism to be part of the broader, less well-defined postmodernist movement, even although many post-structuralists insisted it was not. Thinkers who have been called structuralists include the anthropologist  Claude Levi-Strauss, the linguist  Ferdinand de Saussure, the Marxist philosopher  Louis Althusser, and the semiotician  Algirdas Greimas. The early writings of the psychoanalystJacques Lacan  and the literary theorist  Roland Barthes  have also been called structuralist. Those who began as structuralists but became post-structuralists include  Michel Foucault,  Roland Barthes,  Jean Baudrillard,  Gilles Deleuze. Other post-structuralists includeJacques Derrida,  Pierre Bourdieu,  Jean-Francois Lyotard,  Julia Kristeva,  Helene Cixous, and  Luce Irigaray.